According to a study by Marco Colasanti et al. (2024), it is possible to identify how guilty, innocent, honest, and dishonest subjects examine crime-related stimuli. In their research, the authors employed RealEye to provide insights into the differences in visual behavior, contributing to our understanding of deceptive behavior and visual attention.
The study involved 160 participants, who were divided into four groups based on their honesty and guilt: guilty-honest, guilty-dishonest, innocent-honest, and innocent-dishonest. Each participant was asked to view images of a complex mock crime scene and neutral images on a computer screen. The RealEye software captured and analyzed their eye movements to determine patterns in visual exploration.
The heatmaps showing the prototypical exploration patterns of image by participants assigned to Guilty Honest (panel A), Guilty Deceptive (panel B), Innocent Honest (panel C), and Naive (panel D) (authors' description)
Using RealEye in the "Crime Scene":
Calibration: Before the main task, participants underwent a calibration process using RealEye. This involved looking at a moving dot on the screen to ensure the software could accurately track their eye movements. Calibration helps obtaining reliable data.
Viewing Images: Participants were then shown a series of images, including both neutral images and target images of the mock crime scene. The images were displayed on a computer screen equipped with an HD webcam, which recorded their eye movements using RealEye.
Data Capture and Analysis: The study focused on specific areas of interest (AOIs) within the images, particularly the parts where the mock crime took place. RealEye's software analyzed the number and duration of fixations in these AOIs, comparing the visual patterns among the four groups of participants.
A Picture divided into AOIs. The desk that contained the exam paper that some participants photographed is visible in panel A (the left AOI) (authors' description)
Key Findings
Guilty and Dishonest Behavior: Participants who were guilty or dishonest tended to have fewer and shorter fixations on the crime-related areas of the images. This suggests that these individuals may avoid looking directly at incriminating evidence.
Innocent and Honest Behavior: In contrast, innocent and honest participants had more frequent and longer fixations on the crime-related areas, indicating a more thorough visual exploration of the scene.
Neutral Images: No significant differences were observed between the groups when viewing neutral images, reinforcing that the variations in visual patterns were specific to the crime-related stimuli.
By using RealEye, this study sheds light on how different individuals visually process a crime scene, offering insights into deception. The ability to distinguish between guilty, innocent, honest, and dishonest visual patterns has significant implications for forensic psychology and criminal investigations. Eye-tracking data can aid in developing more effective interrogation techniques and lie detection methods.
You can run a similar study!
Follow the steps below to start your own experiment with RealEye:
.jpg)
